<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The FORWARD project blog &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward</link>
	<description>blogging on emerging and future threats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Reader uses sandbox tech to block attacks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/adobe-reader-uses-sandbox-tech-to-block-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/adobe-reader-uses-sandbox-tech-to-block-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hua Lu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News link:Click me Adobe&#8217;s popular PDF viewer, Adobe Reader, always attracts large amount of hackers who try to exploit its vulnerabilities. Some reports found that Adobe Reader is at the top list for having the most exploits for web-based attacks. Now, the company wants to &#8220;turning to sandboxing technology designed to isolate code from other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News link:<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20011015-245.html?tag=topStories3" target="_blank">Click me</a></p>
<p>Adobe&#8217;s popular PDF viewer, Adobe Reader, always attracts large amount of hackers who try to exploit its vulnerabilities. Some reports found that Adobe Reader is at the top list for having the most exploits for web-based attacks. Now, the company wants to &#8220;<em>turning to sandboxing technology designed to isolate code from other  parts of the computer.</em>&#8221; A &#8220;protected mode&#8221; will be added to the Adobe Reader for Windows which will be enabled by default and release later this year. Because of minor attack against Macintosh system, there is no plan to implement this feature to Mac OS yet.</p>
<p>Several changes will be made due to sandbox mechanism. The PDF processing will be confined, such as executing JavaScript, parsing JPEG image etc. Application running in the Adobe Reader will not be able to communicate with the operating system any more. &#8220;<em>This is an additional layer of defense that will help protect users in  case they encounter a malicious or corrupted PDF.</em>&#8221; said Brad Arkin, the director of product security and privacy of Adobe. The new feature could limit the number of exploits, but not all of them. Some attacks like phishing and weak cryptography still exist.</p>
<p>Some experts believe that Sandbox can not prevent code execution vulnerability, but it makes attacks much hard to success. With Sandbox, the attackers need to find vulnerability in both programs, Reader and Sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/adobe-reader-uses-sandbox-tech-to-block-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spy on BitTorrent users in real-time</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/spy-on-bittorrent-users-in-real-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/spy-on-bittorrent-users-in-real-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boulouk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a paper presented at the Usenix Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats researchers devised a way to monitor BitTorrent users. By monitoring the users they accomplished to create a list of ip-addresses of individuals and track the content they are sending and receiving. In that paper the researchers demonstrated the technique to continuously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a paper presented at the <a href="http://www.usenix.org/events/leet10/tech/" target="_blank">Usenix Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats</a> researchers devised a way to monitor BitTorrent users. By monitoring the users they accomplished to create a list of ip-addresses of individuals and track the content they are sending and receiving.</p>
<p>In that paper the researchers <a href="http://www.pinewswire.net/2010/05/researchers-spy-on-bittorrent-users-in-real-time/">demonstrated</a> the technique to continuously spy on BitTorrent users for 103 days. They collected 148 million IP addresses and identified 2 billion copies of downloads, many of them copyrighted.</p>
<p>From this research most important is that identified the IP addresses where much of the content originated. This means that the individuals that creating the torrent files are few. Therefore, the question is why the anti-piracy groups try to stop millions of downloaders instead of a few content providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/spy-on-bittorrent-users-in-real-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social networks give users&#8217; data to advertisers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/social-networks-give-users-data-to-advertisers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/social-networks-give-users-data-to-advertisers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tsikudis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Across the web, its common for advertisers like Google Inc.&#8217;s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.&#8217;s Right Media, to receive the address of the page from which a user clicked on an advertisement. They receive nothing more than an incomprehensible string of letters and numbers that can&#8217;t be used to retrieve users&#8217; information. However, with social networking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the web, its common for advertisers like Google Inc.&#8217;s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.&#8217;s Right Media, to receive the address of the page from which a user clicked on an advertisement. They receive nothing more than an incomprehensible string of letters and numbers that can&#8217;t be used to retrieve users&#8217; information.</p>
<p>However, with social networking sites, those addresses include data which advertisers can use to look up individual profiles and discover users&#8217; personal information  and interests, contrary to their privacy policy and their promises they don&#8217;t share such information without consent.</p>
<p>After Wall Street Journal&#8217;s questions, Facebook and MySpace moved to make changes to stop the handover.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you are looking at your profile page and you click on an advertisement, you are telling that advertiser who you are&#8221;, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School said.</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-enlargePic07.html?project=imageShell07&amp;bigImage=FACEBOOKB-WSJ-100521.gif&amp;h=743&amp;w=959&amp;title=WSJ.COM&amp;thePubDate=20080826">graphic</a> about Internet sites that share information that could be tied to individual profiles.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256701215465596.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/social-networks-give-users-data-to-advertisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Street View cars stealed information from WiFi Networks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/google-street-view-cars-stealed-information-from-wifi-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/google-street-view-cars-stealed-information-from-wifi-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>papasav</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced 3 days ago it had accidentally picked up on Wi-Fi data while taking photos for Google Maps&#8217; Street View feature. It used the cars to capture videos through the panoramic cameras and on the move it caught the SSIDs and MAC addresses that identified networks and devices. It didn&#8217;t know that as it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google announced 3 days ago it had accidentally picked up on Wi-Fi data while taking photos for  Google Maps&#8217; Street View feature.</p>
<p>It used the cars to capture videos through the panoramic cameras and on the move it caught the SSIDs and MAC addresses that identified networks and  devices. It didn&#8217;t know that as it was taking pictures, the camera system collected &#8216;useful&#8217; data from Local WiFi Networks. This information which are collected are used to improve the location based services.</p>
<p><span id="more-843"></span>Google thought that the software collected onlyn harmless and useless data but few days ago the said in the blog they open( http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/wifi-data-collection-update.html ) that there was an additional code in the software that this code was implemented in 2006 by an engineer who was working on an experimental Wi-Fi project and  wrote a  piece of code that sampled all categories of publicly broadcast Wi-Fi  data.</p>
<p>This opened thousand of questions about the privacy of Street View data.</p>
<p>Google insisted in a statement that it hadn&#8217;t intended to collect the  data or had any knowledge that it existed until now.</p>
<p>As we can see no one is secure in our days. If you have a WiFi Network at home you can being hacked from everyone if you use none or weak secutiry(WEP keys). Try to use WPA-2 protocol which until now is unbreakable.</p>
<p>Recourses:</p>
<p>1) <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/05/google-street-view-cams/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/05/google-street-view-cams/</a></p>
<div id="TixyyLink" style="overflow: hidden;color: #000000;background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-decoration: none;border: medium none"><a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/05/14/google.admits.collecting.wi.fi.info.with.map.team/#ixzz0oDDaDk9D"></a></div>
<p>2)  <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/google_street_view_cars_were_collecting_payload_data_from_wifi_networks/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/google_street_view_cars_were_collecting_payload_data_from_wifi_networks/</a></p>
<p>3) <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/google-says-wifi-data-collection-was-a-mistake.ars">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/google-says-wifi-data-collection-was-a-mistake.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/google-street-view-cars-stealed-information-from-wifi-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McAfee Faulty Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/mcafee-faulty-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/mcafee-faulty-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hickson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent security update for McAfee Antivirus made systems reboot abnormally or loose network access for extended periods of time, causing a lot of damage to hospitals, companies and schools that used this particular anti-virus. The bugged update only affected computers running Windows XP Service Pack 3 and caused them running in a reboot loop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent security update for McAfee Antivirus made systems reboot abnormally or loose network access for extended periods of time, causing a lot of damage to hospitals, companies and schools that used this particular anti-virus. The bugged update only affected computers running Windows XP Service Pack 3 and caused them running in a reboot loop or loosing network access. The problem was caused by a virus definition file, which misinterpreted a vital system file (svchost.exe) as a virus and quarantined it, causing the system not to work properly and eventually rebooting. McAfee immediately removed the faulty update file from their servers preventing any further impact.</p>
<p><span id="more-780"></span>The computer recovery though couldn’t be automated and personal attention to each computer from a technician appeared to be the only way to fix the problem.  McAfee claims that the update only hit 0.5 percent of its customer’s computers, including Intel Company.  Barry McPherson, executive vice president of support and customer service at McAfee in an attempt to apologize for all the inconvenience caused said: &#8220;<em>First off, I want to apologize on behalf of McAfee and say that we&#8217;re extremely sorry for any impact the faulty signature update file may have caused you and your organizations.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>After McAfee’s gaff, not only did they apologize, but they took serious measures in order that no similar mistakes happen in the future. For that matter, they started implementing additional QA protocols for any releases that directly impact critical system files and they plan to add capabilities to its cloud-based Artemis system that will provide an additional level of protection against false positives. As if all that wasn’t enough hackers all over the world took advantage of the situation and tricked people into visiting websites that had information about fixing the bug, which actually were highly malicious.</p>
<p>Sources:<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20100423/bs_nf/72944;_ylt=AntUUuCU19dBKoJSDTBVg2KDzdAF;_ylu=X3oDMTJiZmdvdjQwBGFzc2V0A25mLzIwMTAwNDIzLzcyOTQ0BHBvcwMxBHNlYwN5bl9wYWdpbmF0ZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA21jYWZlZTM5c3NodQ--"></p>
<p>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20100423/bs_nf/72944;_ylt=AntUUuCU19dBKoJSDTBVg2KDzdAF;_ylu=X3oDMTJiZmdvdjQwBGFzc2V0A25mLzIwMTAwNDIzLzcyOTQ0BHBvcwMxBHNlYwN5bl9wYWdpbmF0ZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA21jYWZlZTM5c3NodQ&#8211;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://siblog.mcafee.com/support/mcafee-response-on-current-false-positive-issue/">http://siblog.mcafee.com/support/mcafee-response-on-current-false-positive-issue/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/mcafee-faulty-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad Jailbreak accomplished</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/ipad-jailbreak-accomplished/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/ipad-jailbreak-accomplished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>papasav</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 24 hours of the iPad&#8217;s official release, the &#8220;usual suspects&#8221; already gained root access to iPad.  Jailbreak is a method of hacking an iPhone, iPod, iPad to install non-Apple-approved programs and run system hacks. First the iPhone jailbreaker MuscleNerd used a port of “Spirit” jailbreak by Comex which exploits a bug found in iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" title="Λίγα 24ώρα μετά από την επίσημη κυκλοφορία  του, οι “γνωστοί άγνωστοι” απέκτησαν ήδη root access στο iPad!">After 24  hours of the iPad&#8217;s official release, the &#8220;usual suspects&#8221; already gained  root access to iPad.  Jailbreak is a method of hacking an iPhone, iPod, iPad to </span></span>install non-Apple-approved programs and run system hacks.</p>
<p><span id="more-749"></span>First the iPhone jailbreaker MuscleNerd used a port of “Spirit” jailbreak by Comex which exploits a bug found in iPhone OS 3.1.3  and now on iPad/iPhone OS 3.2. He gained root access on the iPad which this showed that the iPad can been easily jailbreak.</p>
<p>After 4-5 days, GeoHot revealed some pictures in his twitter showing verbose mode running on his iPad.Verbose mode shows everything that iPad is doing on bootup. After doing this he posted a new picture where he managed to install blackra1n and Cydia to iPad.</p>
<p>Jailbreak methods are rising exponentially and as we can see Apple doesn&#8217;t care to patch the &#8220;holes&#8221; of the OS. Also and iphone OS 4.0 in less than a week has been jailbreak which this shows that the &#8220;holes&#8221; are still open. iPad will have multitasking earlier than Steve Jobs would want to after all<strong>..</strong></p>
<p><strong>Resources:</strong></p>
<p>1) <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10472184-1.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10472184-1.html</a></p>
<p>2)<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/04/ipad-spirit-jailbreak-demonstrated-by-musclenerd-now-it-reall/"> http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/04/ipad-spirit-jailbreak-demonstrated-by-musclenerd-now-it-reall/</a></p>
<p>3)<a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2010/04/04/ipad-spirit-jailbreak-video-demo-released/"> http://www.pmptoday.com/2010/04/04/ipad-spirit-jailbreak-video-demo-released/</a></p>
<p>4)<a href="http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2010/04/09/ipad-jailbreak-blackra1n/"> http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2010/04/09/ipad-jailbreak-blackra1n/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/ipad-jailbreak-accomplished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers grow in number and skills in China</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/hackers-grow-in-number-and-skills-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/hackers-grow-in-number-and-skills-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chconst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Symantec, China&#8217;s hacking scene is growing rapidly, having become second in the world, after the US. Chinese Internet users appear interested in criminal hacking and government spying. &#8220;China’s hacking scene is clearly an active one&#8221;, &#8220;These individuals and groups are known for discovering vulnerabilities, writing exploit code and developing sophisticated hacking techniques&#8221; as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Symantec, China&#8217;s hacking scene is growing rapidly, having become second in the world, after the US. Chinese Internet users appear interested in criminal hacking and government spying. &#8220;China’s hacking scene is clearly an active one&#8221;, &#8220;These individuals and groups are known for discovering vulnerabilities, writing exploit code and developing sophisticated hacking techniques&#8221; as the report states.</p>
<p><span id="more-664"></span>By analyzing the IP addresses of active SPAM mail servers show that  US was the 1st, distributed  36% of global malware  followed by china 17.8% and Romania at 16.5%. A main reason for making US first in malware is that most web based e-mail servers are hosted in US (e.g Gmail, Yahoo).  Analyzing the actual IP addresses  found in the e-mail&#8217;s headers revealed China as the country of origin. “When considering the true location of the sender rather than the location of the email server, fewer attacks are actually sent from North America than it would at first seem.&#8221;</p>
<p>More about Symantec&#8217;s research can be found <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20001234-83.html?tag=mncol;title">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/hackers-grow-in-number-and-skills-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox releases security patch due an integer overflow error.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/firefox-releases-security-patch-due-an-integer-overflow-error/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/firefox-releases-security-patch-due-an-integer-overflow-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zahariad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6.2 almost a week ahead of schedule, after security issues were found in earlier versions. Firefox 3.6.2 was scheduled to launch at 30 of March, but is now available for download. The latest Firefox version fixes a vulnerability that could allow remote code execution attacks. Firefox is the second most popular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla has released Firefox 3.6.2 almost a week ahead of schedule, after security issues were found in earlier versions. Firefox 3.6.2 was scheduled to launch at 30 of March, but is now available for <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">download</a>. The latest Firefox version fixes a vulnerability that could allow remote code execution attacks. Firefox is the second most popular browser in the web and its usage is between 20% and 32%.</p>
<p><span id="more-654"></span>The security hole had led the German government to issue a warning about Firefox 3.6.It warned that the Firefox vulnerability, confirmed by Firefox makers, could allow hackers to run malicious programs on users&#8217; computers.Germany&#8217;s official cyber-security response team &#8211; BurgerCERT &#8211; had recommended that users stop using Firefox until the tested fix was released.</p>
<p>The original Firefox vulnerability was confirmed by maker Mozilla last week on its security blog.It was only the 3.6 version that was affected due to the addition of WOFF fonts.</p>
<p>An <strong>integer overflow</strong> bug exists in the processing of the newly added in 3.6 version WOFF fonts. This can be exploited to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and execute arbitrary code via a web page embedding a WOFF font with an overly large &#8220;origLen&#8221; field.</p>
<p>The vulnerability lies within the WOFF decoder that contains an integer overflow in a font decompression routine. An attacker could use this vulnerability to crash a victim’s browser and execute arbitrary code on his/her system.</p>
<p>References : <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5827&amp;tag=col1;post-5827#more-5827" target="_blank">http://blogs.zdnet.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/firefox-releases-security-patch-due-an-integer-overflow-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gonzalez gets 20 years for TJX credit card scam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/gonzalez-gets-20-years-for-tjx-credit-card-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/gonzalez-gets-20-years-for-tjx-credit-card-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angelpap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Albert Gonzalez is a hacker mastermind who has committed a lot of crimes by stealing credit and debit cards by major US retailers. He has been described as a greed personality motivated by his ego and his thirst for acknowledgment by the public for his computer intrusions. Among his criminal activities he used to exploit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert Gonzalez is a hacker mastermind who has committed a lot of crimes by stealing credit and debit cards by major US retailers. He has been described as a greed personality motivated by his ego and  his thirst for acknowledgment by the public for his computer  intrusions. Among his criminal activities he used to exploit a government agency through his cooperation with the U.S. Secret Service providing classified information to his co-conspirators in the credit-card theft cases. <span id="more-653"></span>How ever, the most difficult hacking operation he has ever successfully accomplished was stealing credit card information from TJX, Office Max, DSW and Dave and  Buster&#8217;s. Although, he has passed the message of stealing private accounts and ruin credit cards, he used hacking for beneficial purposes.</p>
<p>Gonzalez has been sentenced to 20 years in prison. He managed to steal more than 1 million dollars. However is impossible to measure the exact amount of stolen money per person. After his sentence expired he will be supervised for not using for 3 years the Internet and the use of any electronic device will be monitored. The court tried to send a message through this trial to the young people not to attempt doing things like Gonzalez did.</p>
<p>You can find more information <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174124/Gonzalez_gets_20_years_for_TJX_credit_card_scam?taxonomyId=82&amp;pageNumber=1">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/gonzalez-gets-20-years-for-tjx-credit-card-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pwn2Own 2010 &#8211; Attack&#8217;s on browser&#8217;s and mobile devices</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/pwn2own-2010-attacks-on-browsers-and-mobile-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/pwn2own-2010-attacks-on-browsers-and-mobile-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>papasav</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  Pwn2Own contest is back this year and is looking the new winner. The competition starts at 24th of March 2010. in Vancouver. The winner is the person that will successfully hack an application or a  platform and the prize will be $100,000 USD and keep the target that exploit. In the first day the attackers will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  Pwn2Own contest is back this year and is looking the new winner. The competition starts at 24th of March 2010. in Vancouver. The winner is the person that will successfully hack an application or a  platform and the prize will be $100,000 USD and keep the target that exploit.</p>
<p><span id="more-621"></span>In the first day the attackers will try to exploit one of the below web-browsers:</p>
<li>Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 on Windows 7</li>
<li>Mozilla Firefox 3 on Windows 7</li>
<li>Google Chrome 4 on Windows 7</li>
<li>Apple Safari 4 on MacOS X Snow Leopard</li>
<p>Second day will be:</p>
<li>Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista</li>
<li>Mozilla Firefox 3 on Windows Vista</li>
<li>Google Chrome 4 on Windows Vista</li>
<li>Apple Safari 4 on MacOS X Snow Leopard</li>
<p>Third and last day:</p>
<li>Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP</li>
<li>Mozilla Firefox 3 on Windows XP</li>
<li>Google Chrome 4 on Windows XP</li>
<li>Apple Safari 4 on MacOS X Snow Leopard</li>
<p>Also except of web-browsers this year the attackers have the chance to exploit one of the four mobile-devices:</p>
<li>Apple iPhone 3GS</li>
<li>RIM Blackberry Bold 9700</li>
<li>A Nokia device running Symbian S60 (likely the E62)</li>
<li>A Motorola phone running Android (likely the Droid)</li>
<p>Although last year noone have managed to exploit a mobile device, this year the expectations are high that the iPhone will go down. For every successful exploit the winner will keep the device and take $15,000.</p>
<p>Aaron Portnoy,security researcher at TippingPoint and Pwn2Own said: &#8220;&#8221;With all the recent research on mobile phone security being presented worldwide, these devices are quickly becoming a ripe target,First to fall: the iPhone&#8221;.</p>
<p>Miller, the winner of 2008 and 2009 contest which he managed to exploit Safari web browser, this year will stick on Safari to win again the contest. However, Miller said &#8220;in real life the iPhone is harder because you can&#8217;t just execute a shell. You have to write your return-oriented payload to do all your dirty work, which can be a pain.&#8221; We will expect from Miller this year to break the Iphone through Mobile Safari.</p>
<p>Happy exploiting <img src='http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
References:</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/">http://arstechnica.com/security/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5709&amp;tag=content;col1">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5709&amp;tag=content;col1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2010/02/15/pwn2own-2010">http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2010/02/15/pwn2own-2010</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=7367">http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=7367</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ict-forward.eu/forward/pwn2own-2010-attacks-on-browsers-and-mobile-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
